Bhutia

(PC) Guillory v. Bhutia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20232:21-cv-00462California1,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY GUILLORY, No. 2:21-cv-0462 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER TSHERING BHUTIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”), ECF No. 17, which is before the court for screening. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will order service on defendants Tshering Bhutia and Tiffany Flores. I. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT The FAC alleges that defendant Bhutia, a psychiatrist, and defendant Flores, a registered nurse, both of whom were employees at California Medical Facility – Vacaville during the relevant period, deprived him of his Eighth Amendment rights when: (1) defendant Bhutia ordered that plaintiff be given psychotropic medication against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.