(PS) Roberts v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SYDNEY BROOKE ROBERTS and No. 2:22-cv-01699 DJC AC PS DAVID TYRONE SAMUEL, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER and v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The case proceeds on the basis of the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). ECF No. 11. Defendants have moved to dismiss, ECF No. 21, and plaintiffs oppose the motion, ECF No. 22. The matter came on for hearing before the undersigned on May 24, 2023. ECF No. 35. For the reasons explained below, it is recommended that the motion to dismiss be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Also pending before the court is plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend, ECF No. 23, and proposed Fourth Amended Complaint, ECF No. 24. Because the latter was docketed without leave to 25 …