Brewer

(HC) Bingham v. Brewer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 31, 20232:22-cv-02235California388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILLIP ANTHONY BINGHAM, No. 2:22-cv-02235-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DAVID BREWER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel in this petition for writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On March 7, 2022, the postal service returned mail sent to petitioner from the court with a notation that petitioner was “no longer” at FCI- Herlong. A party appearing without counsel must keep the court and all parties apprised of his current address. L.R. 183(b). If mail directed to a petitioner is returned by the postal service and petitioner fails to notify the court and opposing parties within 63 days thereafter of his current address, the court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Id. More than 63 days have passed since the postal service returned the mail and petitioner has not notified the court of his current…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.