Trate

(HC) Robinson v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 31, 20231:22-cv-00906California874 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD EUGENE ROBINSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00906-ADA-CDB (HC)

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS THAT

v. RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS BE

DENIED AND PETITIONER’S PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

B.M. TRATE,

PURSUANT TO § 2241 BE GRANTED

15 Respondent. (ECF Nos. 11, 14) 16 17 Petitioner Edward Eugene Robinson (“Petitioner”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1.) On October 13, 2022, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss Petitioner’s petition. (ECF No. 11.) Petitioner did not respond to Respondent’s motion to dismiss. On February 10, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge found that the sentencing court did not consider Petitioner’s financial resources for paying restitution while incarcerated nor set forth a restitution schedule while incarcerated. (ECF No. 14 at 6.) Instead, the sentencing court 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.