Kuppinger

(PC) Thompson v. Kuppinger

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20232:23-cv-00463California3,409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DeWAYNE THOMPSON, No. 2:23-cv-00463-DJC-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER P. KUPPINGER, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint is before the court for screening. He has paid the filing fee for this action. Screening Standards Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. § 1915A(b). A pro se plaintiff, like other litigants, must satisfy the pleading requirements…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.