Aceves

(PC) Williams v. Aceves

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20232:21-cv-00921California1,004 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III, No. 2:21-cv-0921 DAD KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ACEVES, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 22, 2022, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, and provided plaintiff with the requirements for opposing a motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). Following multiple extensions of time, plaintiff did not file an opposition. As set forth below, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed. Background On November 15, 2021, the court advised plaintiff of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion for summary judgment under Rand, and also advised plaintiff that failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of Court, may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.