Ciolli

(PC) Clark v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20231:21-cv-01081California653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIE DWAYNE CLARK, Case No. 1:21-cv-01081-ADA-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS THE

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

ANDREW CIOLLI, et al., COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Defendants. (ECF No. 16)

17 Plaintiff Willie Dwayne Clark is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 6, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed, without leave to amend, for Plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff was afforded 14 days within which to file any objections. (Id. at 13.) On December 14,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.