CDCR
(PC) Gomez v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFREDO GOMEZ, No. 2:20-cv-0198 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, and is now before the court for consideration of the supplemental filing submitted by plaintiff in relation to his objections to previously issued Findings and Recommendations. See ECF No. 15 (order of district judge referring matter back to the undersigned for further consideration). For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s filing at ECF No. 14 will be construed as a proposed supplemental pleading and plaintiff will be provided an opportunity to file an amended complaint that incorporates any transactions, occurrences, or events relevant to the claims…