CDCR

(PC) Gomez v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20232:20-cv-00198California1,374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFREDO GOMEZ, No. 2:20-cv-0198 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, and is now before the court for consideration of the supplemental filing submitted by plaintiff in relation to his objections to previously issued Findings and Recommendations. See ECF No. 15 (order of district judge referring matter back to the undersigned for further consideration). For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s filing at ECF No. 14 will be construed as a proposed supplemental pleading and plaintiff will be provided an opportunity to file an amended complaint that incorporates any transactions, occurrences, or events relevant to the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.