Hogland

(PC) Hill v. Hogland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20232:23-cv-00221California571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:23-cv-00221 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER HOGLAND, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The application to proceed in forma pauperis represents that plaintiff has no cash or assets and in the last twelve months has not received any money from a business, profession, or self- employment; stocks, bonds, or royalties; rent payments; pensions, annuities, or life insurance payments; or federal or state welfare payments, social security, or other government sources. ECF No. 4. However, plaintiff’s trust account statement, which was filed in several other cases in this district, reflects that as of October 20, 2022,1 plaintiff’s account has a balance of $5,221.90, ////

Approximately two months prior to the initiation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.