Perez

(PC) Gilbert v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20232:22-cv-02160California391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES TRAYZON GILBERT, No. 2:22-cv-2160 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

W. PEREZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that he was falsely found guilty of a rules violation in retaliation for exercising his first amendment rights. By order dated March 29, 2023, the court screened and dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and advised that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 12.) Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, sought additional time to file an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, the undersigned will recommend that this action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.