(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Walmart Super Store

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20232:22-cv-00249California270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:22-cv-00249-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER WALMART SUPER STORE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On April 24, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 18 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any 19 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 20 days. No objections were filed. 21 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. 22 , 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 23 are reviewed de novo. , 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 24 (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 25 district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 26 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper 27 analysis. 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The proposed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.