Brewer

(HC) Moreno v. Brewer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20232:23-cv-00117California998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FERNANDO ANTONIO MORENO, No. 2:23-cv-0117 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

DAVID BREWER, AS MOOT Respondent.

16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner, proceeds without counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Upon screening of the petition, it appears the petition is moot. Before the undersigned recommends dismissal of the petition, petitioner is ordered to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed as moot. I. Screening Standards In screening the petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the court applies the Rule 4 framework of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court. 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254 (“Habeas Rules”, Rule 1(b) (“The district court may apply any or all of these rules to a habeas corpus petition not covered by Rule 1(a).”). In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.