Leibrock

(PS) Selck v. Leibrock

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20232:23-cv-01031California1,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:23-cv-01031 TLN AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE LAW OFFICES OF BRANDAN

LEIBROCK AND JOHN GONZALEZ,

15 Defendants. 16 On June 1, 2023, plaintiff filed this action in pro se and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The undersigned has reviewed the complaint and believes that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s case, and that this case must be dismissed with prejudice. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377, (1994). In 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332(a), “Congress granted federal courts jurisdiction over two general types of cases: cases that “aris[e] under” federal law, § 1331, and cases in which the amount in controversy exceeds $ 75,000 and there is diversity of citizenship among the parties, § 1332(a). These…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.