(PC) Roman v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20231:23-cv-00847California616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ISIDRO ROMAN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00847-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION SMITH, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT

Defendant. (ECF No. 1)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

14 Plaintiff Isidro Roman (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action. On June 2, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of removal of this action from the Court of Appeal of the State of California, Fifth Appellate District, Case No. F085571 (Tuolumne County Superior Court, Case No. CV63312). (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, and Defendant has not had an opportunity to respond to Plaintiff’s notice of removal. However, the Court finds an in forma pauperis application and a response from Defendant unnecessary to address the notice of removal. Under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.