Mercado

(PC) Wilson v. Mercado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20231:22-cv-00278California289 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID WAYNE WILSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00278-ADA-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

v. TO TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO

PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR

GABINO MERCADO, et al., VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Defendants. (ECF No. 54)

16 On June 2, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been resolved in its entirety. (ECF No. 54.) Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically terminates the action without operation of a court order.” Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing Cty. Bd. of Comm’rs, 637 F. App’x 488 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.