(PS) Hedrington v. David Grant Medical Center

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORLONZO HEDRINGTON, No. 2:22-cv-0074 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER, et ORDER AND al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Orlonzo Hedrington is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is defendant City of Fairfield’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 40.) Having considered the parties’ briefing, and for the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that the motion to dismiss be granted and the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on January 10, 2022, by filing a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) On March 22, 2022, 27 1 Although plaintiff filed this action in the Fresno Division the matter was…