J.A.

J.A. v. Madera County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20231:21-cv-00252California1,258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.A., a minor by her Guardian ad Litem No. 1:21-cv-00252-ADA-EPG LUZ ANA VENEGAS, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

ARTEMIO ALFARO, RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO Plaintiffs, DISMISS BE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART v. (ECF No. 29) MADERA COUNTY, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff J.A. (“Plaintiff”), a minor, proceeds in this civil rights action, in her individual capacity and as the successor in interest to her father, Artemio Alfaro, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Luz Ana Venegas. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) brings claims against the County of Madera, Deputy Brendan Johnson, Deputy Logan Majeski, Deputy Jose Iniguez, and Does 1 through 25 (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging unlawful seizure, excessive force, and deprivation of due process pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.