(PC) Doiel v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20232:20-cv-00602California514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ALLEN DOIEL, No. 2:20-CV-0602-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. On February 28, 2023, the District Judge directed Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff has been warned that failure to file to comply with the Court’s orders may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, Plaintiff has not complied. The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court's need to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.