Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDMUNDO ARCINIEGA CALZADA, No. 2:23-cv-0612 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND WARDEN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). In addition, examination of this action and the court’s records reveals that the petitioner is already proceeding with a petition for relief in the same matter. See Arciniega Calzada v. Warden, No. 2:23-cv-0599-EFB (E.D. Cal.). Respondent has been ordered to respond to the petition in that matter. See id. A suit is duplicative if the “claims, parties, and available relief do not significantly differ between the two actions.” Barapind v. Reno, 72 F. Supp.2d 1132, 1145 (E.D. Cal. 1999) (quoting Ridge Gold…