Green

(PS) Mehl v. Green

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20232:21-cv-01861California4,504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GAVIN MEHL, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01861-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs,

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WARREN GREEN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, proceeding without counsel, allege that defendants Wilmington Trust, N.A., PS Funding, Inc (referred to as PeerStreet), Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P., and Andrew B. Still violated plaintiffs’ rights under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the California Rosenthal Act. ECF No. 43. This court previously dismissed plaintiffs’ first amended complaint with leave to amend for failure to state a claim. ECF Nos. 16 & 40. Defendants now move to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint. ECF No. 44. The second amended complaint similarly fails to state a claim, and I will recommend that it be dismissed without leave to amend. See ECF Nos. 38 & 40. 28 Background A. Plaintiffs’ Allegations …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.