Ramirez
(PC) Chavez v. Ramirez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PABLO CHAVEZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-01269-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO APPOINT COUNSEL
v. (Doc. No. 15) RAMIREZ, et al.,
ORDER SUA SPONTE GRANTING
Defendants. PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION TO FILE
OBJECTIONS
JUNE 20, 2023, DEADLINE
17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel. (Doc. No. 15). Plaintiff, a former state prisoner, is proceeding pro se on his initial complaint. (Doc. No. 1). The Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in this action in forma pauperis in this action. (Doc. No. 8). Plaintiff seeks appointment counsel because “he does not now [sic] what to do in these matters.” (Doc. No. 15 at 1). Plaintiff also requests to re-open “Chavez v. KCJBM,” “Chavez v. Cal Fire,” and “Chavez v. KCJ” and seeks appointment of counsel to assist him in re- opening the three cases. Request for Appointment of Counsel in the Instant Action The United States…