Hill

(PC) Weisner v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20232:21-cv-02275California740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANKIE WEISNER, No. 2:21-CV-2275-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RICK HILL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 40, for leave to file a second amended complaint. With his motion, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, ECF No. 41. Defendants oppose Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 42. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that a party may amend his or her pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days of serving the pleading or, if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, within 21 days after service of the responsive pleading, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A), or within 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f) of the rules, whichever time is earlier, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). In all other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.