Triplett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC DEWAYNE HATTON, No. 2:21-cv-01206 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DUSTIN TRIPLETT, Defendants. 16 A recent court order was served to plaintiff by mail and returned as undeliverable. More than 63 days have passed, and plaintiff has not updated his address or otherwise communicated with the court. It is plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times and plaintiff was previously advised of this requirement. (See ECF No 3-1 at 2.) Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at plaintiff’s record address is fully effective. Pursuant to Local Rule 183(b), “[i]f mail directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and if such plaintiff fails to notify the Court and opposing parties within sixty-three (63) days thereafter of a current address, the Court may dismiss the action without prejudice for…