Cueva

(HC) Marsh v. Cueva

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20232:23-cv-00877California179 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] JEFFREY PAUL MARSH, No. 2:23-CV-0877-DMC-P Petitioner,

ORDER

V. TRENT ALLEN, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this petition 18 for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. A review of the docket reflects that □□□□□□□ 19 of the State of California” is listed in additional to Warden Trent Allen as a respondent to this 20 || action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate “People of the State of California” as an || improper respondent. See Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994); 22 || see also Rule 2(a), Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. This action shall proceed 23 || against Warden Trent Allen as the only respondent. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 || Dated: June 6, 2023 Ss.cqo_ DENNIS M. COTA …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.