Medina
Medina v. Mapes
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20231:21-cv-00844California1,597 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADLEY MEDINA, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00844-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER (1) DENYING APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT
13 v. PREJUDICE AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS
TO EACH FILE INDIVIDUAL LONG FORM
COURTNEY MAPES, M.D., APPLICATIONS; (2) DIRECTING THE
CLERK OF COURT TO SEND PLAINTIFFS Defendant. LONG FORM APPLICATIONS; (3) DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT
COUNSEL AND; (4) GRANTING
EXTENSION AS TO EXPERT REBUTTAL
DEADLINE
18 (ECF Nos. 44, 45). 19 Plaintiffs, now proceeding pro se, have filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 45), as well as a motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 44). For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ application to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice, deny Plaintiffs’ motion for the appointment of counsel, and grant Plaintiff’s request for an…