Medina

Medina v. Mapes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20231:21-cv-00844California1,597 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADLEY MEDINA, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00844-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER (1) DENYING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT

13 v. PREJUDICE AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS

TO EACH FILE INDIVIDUAL LONG FORM

COURTNEY MAPES, M.D., APPLICATIONS; (2) DIRECTING THE

CLERK OF COURT TO SEND PLAINTIFFS Defendant. LONG FORM APPLICATIONS; (3) DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL AND; (4) GRANTING

EXTENSION AS TO EXPERT REBUTTAL

DEADLINE

18 (ECF Nos. 44, 45). 19 Plaintiffs, now proceeding pro se, have filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 45), as well as a motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 44). For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ application to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice, deny Plaintiffs’ motion for the appointment of counsel, and grant Plaintiff’s request for an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.