Gilbert v. Bonfare Markets, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20231:22-cv-00605California722 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN GILBERT, No. 1:22-cv-00605-ADA-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT

BONFARE MARKETS, INC. dba BONFARE MARKET #43, et al., (ECF No. 31) 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Darren Gilbert (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action on May 20, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Act. (Id.) On October 13, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against Defendants Bonfare Markets, Inc. dba Bonfare Market #43; Sameer Abdulwahid Nagi bda Bonfare Market #43; Sanaa A. Obaid bda Bonfare Market #43; and Stop’N ‘Save, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). (ECF No. 21.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.