Joksch
(PC) Elder v. Joksch
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COREY JEROME ELDER, No. 2:16-CV-1925-DJC-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOKSCH, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 79, for substitution of parties. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel, ECF No. 80, will be addressed separately. On January 24, 2023, counsel for Defendant Joksch, who is the sole remaining defendant in this action, filed a notice of Defendant’s death. See ECF No. 71. Plaintiff now seeks leave to substitute “Defendant C. Joksch’s estate” for Defendant. ECF No. 79. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(a), a party moving to substitute “must provide evidence that the party to be substituted is the successor-in-interest or legal representative of the decedent.” F.T.C. v. AMG Servs., Inc., 2014 WL 2742872 (D. Nev. 2014). A “proper party” is the…