Aramark
(PC) Perez v. Aramark
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MARCELLO PEREZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00581-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO (1) ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE AND (2) v. PROVIDE NOTICE OF CHANGE OF
ADDRESS FORM
ARAMARK, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
Defendants.
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS
18 On April 14, 2023, Plaintiff Marcello Perez, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff has not filed anything since the complaint, including any request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Accordingly, on April 17, 2023, the Court ordered him to submit an IFP application or pay the filing fee within forty-five days. (ECF No. 3). The Court warned him that, “[f]ailure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.” (Id. at 1). The…