Aramark

(PC) Perez v. Aramark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20231:23-cv-00581California481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MARCELLO PEREZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00581-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO (1) ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE AND (2) v. PROVIDE NOTICE OF CHANGE OF

ADDRESS FORM

ARAMARK, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

Defendants.

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS

18 On April 14, 2023, Plaintiff Marcello Perez, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff has not filed anything since the complaint, including any request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Accordingly, on April 17, 2023, the Court ordered him to submit an IFP application or pay the filing fee within forty-five days. (ECF No. 3). The Court warned him that, “[f]ailure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.” (Id. at 1). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.