Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONNELL DAVIS, No. 2:19-cv-01976-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. HARRIS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has alleged that defendants Harris and Hunter were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by withholding his prescribed diabetic snack for three days, and that they did so in retaliation for plaintiff filing a grievance about not receiving his snacks. Defendants moved for summary judgment on all claims, and the court found that there was a genuine dispute as to whether defendants were deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical needs and whether Harris retaliated against plaintiff. The court granted summary judgment for Hunter on plaintiff’s relation claim because there was no evidence that Hunter knew plaintiff had engaged in a protected activity. After the court resolved all…