(PS) Rojas v. CA Correctional Health Care Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20232:22-cv-01100California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01100-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On April 24, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that it failed to state a claim, and allowed thirty days for him to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 7. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to administer justice expeditiously and avoid…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.