Rollin

(PC) Curry v. Rollin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20232:23-cv-00791California1,749 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN INDIANA CURRY, No. 2:23-cv-00791-TLN-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROLLIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing a complaint, plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and a motion to preserve evidence. Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). Screening Standards Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.