(PC) Cunningham v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20232:23-cv-00270California2,453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CUNNINGHAM, No. 2:23-cv-00270-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing a complaint (ECF No. 1), he has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). The court will grant his application and screen the complaint. Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis The court has reviewed plaintiff’s application and finds that it makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). Screening Standards Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.