(SS) Canady v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20232:22-cv-00920California3,808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY LAMONT CANADY, No. 2:22-cv-00920 CKD SS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”). The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in the case, including the entry of final judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and deny the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, born in 1964, applied on January 10, 2020 for SSI. Administrative Transcript (“AT”) 32, 61. He alleged disability beginning August 8, 2008, later amended to the filing date of January 10, 2020. AT 32, 64. Plaintiff alleged he was unable to work due to back and shoulder…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.