Covello

(PC) Schmaus v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20232:20-cv-01356California246 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON ERIK SCHMAUS, No. 2:20-cv-1356 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER P. COVELLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 46. In support of the request, plaintiff states that he has been hospitalized close to 20 months in the last three years. Id. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. //// ////…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.