(PC) Cardenas v. Coalinga State Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20231:23-cv-00875California209 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 RUBEN LEE CARDENAS, 1:23-cv-00875-EPG (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, et al., (ECF No. 2). Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 17 are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 18 Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). 19 On June 5, 2023, Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2). Examination of Plaintiffs application reveals that Plaintiffs unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED. 23 SO ORDERED. °° Dated: _ June 9, 2023 [Jee heey — …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.