Lua

(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Lua

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20232:21-cv-01452California412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, Case No. 2:21-cv-01452-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TERESA LUA, Defendant. 16 I previously screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint, notified him that it did not state a claim, and recommended that the amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. ECF No. 7. After considering plaintiff’s objections to that recommendation, I vacated the findings and recommendations and gave him thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 20. I subsequently granted plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time and gave him until May 26, 2023, to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 15. Despite that extension, he has not done so. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, which may include dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.