Rice

Rice v. County of Lassen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20232:20-cv-02427California659 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENT RICE, an individual; and A.R., a No. 2:20-cv-02427-TLN-KJN minor, by and through her Guardian ad litem, BRENT RICE, Plaintiff, ORDER v. COUNTY OF LASSEN, et al., Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Petition for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem. (ECF No. 23.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 17(c) allows for the appointment of a guardian ad litem to “sue or defend on behalf of a minor or an incompetent person.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c). The Court originally granted Plaintiffs’ petition to appoint A.R.’s father, Brent Rice, as her guardian ad litem based on Plaintiffs’ representation that A.R. was a minor. (ECF No. 6.) Defendants later argued that A.R. was never a minor during the pendency of this action. In response, Plaintiffs apparently concede A.R. was not a minor during this action and now argue instead that A.R. is incompetent because she suffers from autism and mental illness. (ECF No. 21.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.