(SS) Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20232:21-cv-02421California4,166 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARON NICOLE RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:21-cv-02421-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34, and for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383f.1 For the reasons that follow, the court will DENY plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and GRANT the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. ////

DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance Program, and who suffer from a mental or physical disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1); Bowen v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467, 470 (1986). SSI is paid to financially needy disabled persons. 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a); Washington…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.