Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD ROJAS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01977-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. E. LOPEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff brings this section 1983 case against various correctional officer and medical defendants. The substance of his allegations is difficult to understand owing to the second amended complaint’s lack of organization. The allegations I can understand are fanciful. As such, the second amended complaint does not state a cognizable claim. I now recommend that this action be dismissed on that basis.

28 Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a 6 …