Sanders

Sanders v. Hicks

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20231:22-cv-00577California359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILLIP SANDERS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00577-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING SHOW CAUSE

ORDER

v.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

SHERIFF ROBERT HICKS, ET AL, TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO CORRECT

Defendants. DOCKET (Doc. Nos. 9, 10) 17 18 On April 25, 2023, the Court issued to pro se Plaintiff an order to show cause why the Court should not dismiss this action as barred by the two-year statute of limitations and for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 8). In response, pro se Plaintiff filed a motion to amend his complaint and a First Amended Complaint on May 26, 2023. (Doc. Nos. 9, 10). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 permits, inter alia, a party as a right to file an amended complaint before a defendant is served and responds. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A). Also, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend their complaint before dismissal of the action.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.