Andrew

(PC) Ricalls v. Andrew

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20232:23-cv-00771California1,480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LEONARD RICALLS, No. 2:23-cv-00771-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER P. ANDREW, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court must screen his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Screening Standards Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. § 1915A(b). /////

1 He has paid the filing fee. A pro se plaintiff, like other litigants, must satisfy the pleading…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.