Verizon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELIA HALOUSEK, Case No. 2:22-cv-01728-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VERIZON, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint that contains essentially the same factual allegations as her previous complaint. Again, the amended complaint fails to state a claim. Since the amended complaint contains the same deficiencies as her previous one, I find that granting leave to amend would be futile and recommend dismissal without leave to amend. Screening and Pleading Requirements A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is entitled to relief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and provide “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). The plausibility standard does not require detailed allegations, but legal conclusions do not suffice. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 26 …