Watrous

(PC) Richson-Bey v. Watrous

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20231:21-cv-01482California10,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEAN J. RICHSON-BEY, 1:21-cv-01482-JLT-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO SUPPLEMENT THE SECOND

vs. AMENDED COMPLAINT

WATROUS, et al., (ECF No. 23.)

Defendants AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE ON OR

BEFORE JUNE 27, 2023

24 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Sean J. Richson-Bey, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on October 5, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On May 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to file supplemental pleadings pursuant to Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 14.) On June 13, 2022, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.