Curry

(PC) Humphries v. Curry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20232:22-cv-00090California668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARYLE HUMPHRIES, No. 2:22-cv-0090 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER P. CURRY, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 10, 2023, plaintiff filed a document that contains multiple requests. Defendant filed an opposition; plaintiff did not file a reply. First, plaintiff seeks to obtain the attendance of an incarcerated witness. As plaintiff was informed in the court’s recent discovery and scheduling order, motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses are to be filed with the pretrial statement. (ECF No. 26 at 2.) The parties have not yet been ordered to file pretrial statements. Thus, plaintiff’s motion is premature, and is denied without prejudice to its renewal after the court orders the filing of pretrial statements. Second, plaintiff appears to seek an order compelling defendant to respond to plaintiff’s request for production…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.