Zimmerman
(PC) Martin v. Zimmerman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED ANDREW MARTIN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01455-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
v. (Doc. 11) MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN, et al., Defendant. 16 Jared Andrew Martine, who is proceeding pro se, was a pretrial detainee when he initiated this civil rights action. (See generally Doc. 1.) The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to comply with a Court order and failed to prosecute this matter. (Doc. 11.) Specifically, Plaintiff violated Local Rule 183(b) by failing to keep the Court appraised of a current address. (Id.) Thus, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Id. at 2.) The findings and recommendations were served upon Plaintiff at the address on record on May 15, 2023. It contained a notice that any objections were to be filed within 14 days. (Id. at 3.) In addition, Plaintiff was informed the “failure to file objections within…