Zimmerman

(PC) Martin v. Zimmerman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20231:22-cv-01455California403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED ANDREW MARTIN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01455-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

v. (Doc. 11) MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN, et al., Defendant. 16 Jared Andrew Martine, who is proceeding pro se, was a pretrial detainee when he initiated this civil rights action. (See generally Doc. 1.) The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to comply with a Court order and failed to prosecute this matter. (Doc. 11.) Specifically, Plaintiff violated Local Rule 183(b) by failing to keep the Court appraised of a current address. (Id.) Thus, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Id. at 2.) The findings and recommendations were served upon Plaintiff at the address on record on May 15, 2023. It contained a notice that any objections were to be filed within 14 days. (Id. at 3.) In addition, Plaintiff was informed the “failure to file objections within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.