(PS) Mendez v. Sacramento Police Officers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20232:21-cv-01965California421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTORIA REYES MENDEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-1965-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO POLICE OFFICERS, Defendants.

17 On December 19, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified her that it failed state a claim, and granted her thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on April 10, 2023, I ordered her to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 6. I notified her that if she wished to continue with this lawsuit, she would need to file an amended complaint. I also warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the April 10 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the April 10, 2023 order.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.