Cates

(PC) Zamora v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20231:23-cv-00373California5,275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SANTIAGO MANUEL ZAMORA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00373-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION

B. CATES, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF Defendants. ACTION 14 (ECF No. 12)

16 Plaintiff Santiago Manuel Zamora is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on March 10, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On April 7, 2023, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable retaliation claim against only Defendant Rodriguez, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed only on the retaliation claim. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.