Barrera

Barrera v. City of Woodland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20232:18-cv-00329California2,991 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL BARRERA, et al., No. 2:18-cv-00329-JAM-KJN Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON

CITY OF WOODLAND, et al., FAMILIAL ASSOCIATION CLAIM Defendants. 16 The matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment following an appeal and remand from the Ninth Circuit. See Defs.’ Mot. for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 66. The Ninth Circuit vacated and remanded the Court’s order denying qualified immunity to Defendants Gray, Wright, Lal, Davis, and Krause on Plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment familial association claim. See USCA Mandate, ECF No. 102. Having reviewed the parties’ supplemental briefs, the record, and applicable authority, the Court grants qualified immunity for Defendants Gray, Wright, Lal, Davis, and Krause on Plaintiffs’ familial association claim. See Pls.’ Suppl. Brief, ECF No. 107; Defs.’ Suppl. Brief, ECF No. 106. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.