(PC) Head v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES HEAD, No. 2:19-cv-1663 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner, proceeding pro se, with this civil action. On March 10, 2023, defendants Shelton and Endrizzi filed motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. On April 10, 2023, the undersigned directed the moving defendants’ counsel to re-serve plaintiff at his new address of record, and plaintiff was granted 45 days from the date of the order to file oppositions to the pending motions. (ECF No. 133.) The motions were re-served on April 11, 2023, and April 12, 2023. (ECF Nos. 134, 135.) Over 45 days have passed, and plaintiff did not oppose the motions. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of…