(PC)Elliott

(PC)Elliott v. Ehlers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20232:22-cv-01040California403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER ELLIOTT, No. 2:22-cv-01040-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. EHLERS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On April 10, 2023, Plaintiff filed a document claiming he would like to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 18.) On April 17, 2023, the magistrate judge noted Plaintiff’s failure to provide substantive objections and granted Plaintiff an additional fourteen days to file a second amended complaint that complies with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.